General > Discussion
Seven Day Roguelike entry up for deletion in Wikipedia
Santiago Zapata:
Mind you, even the Roguelike article has been considered for deletion... wikipedia has lot all of its charm to me
If I want to see an encyclopedia with strictly verifiable, academic content, I'd rather visit a library... methinks the people that are actually trying to make it better do not realize this.
zaimoni:
--- Quote from: DisaffectedBeta on July 23, 2007, 01:49 ---What sort of articles have you had to back up, Zaimoni?
--- End quote ---
I'm backing up anything I may need to refer to in bootstrapping my second business. [Strictly, an LLC I'm a founding member of; ....]
In practice, this means any page with substantive content in:
* Thermodynamics
* Kinetic gas theory/statistical mechanics
** At least three useful concrete-example pages are nominated for later deletion here, apparently because they require background equivalent to a higher degree in one of mathematics, physics, or chemistry to immediately understand. I formally have this background (Master's in mathematics).
* Chemical reaction kinetics
* Chemical equilibria
In these domains, there currently is no other equivalently competent central website. The next best contender for chemical equilibria is IUPAC, but they don't have sketched derivations. (Which is a critical problem, as I need to understand the models well enough to rederive them correctly. I've already found a fundamental example where the standard construction is formally wrong.)
For the other domains mentioned, there is no "next best contender".
Zeb:
Funny that they'd delete articles like that, but leave hundreds of articles on video game characters that are of no possible use to anyone.
Oh well. I stopped really caring about Wikipedia after my main account got banned during the Encyclopedia Dramatica witchhunt. I had been on the fast track to adminship too...
Jim9137:
If they want verifiable sources, link to homepages of 7DRL/*RL/etc and describe the game in "DoomRL is a rogue-like that is based upon Doom."
And that'd be about it.
Yeup. Unless they decide to be snappy and protect it from edits.
Kornel Kisielewicz:
The problem is that all roguelikes sources are "self-published" so "not verifyable".
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version